Although women may get larger breasts, the medical procedure is cialis company cialis generique still not free from a great number of difficulties

It also shows that women using oral contraceptives and adding calcium in their diet gain significantly more bone mineral density in their hips and spines viagra pour femme viagra alo mama

One can search for sleeping drug assessments linked with various sleeping pills through reliable websites online This would be very obliging for a patient to acquire the information that is necessitate for knowing about assorted sleeping viagra.com acheter viagra medicines that he desire to think about

Viagra has been known to work for men whose impotence is caused legal viagra alternative ������ �� by psychological factors in significantly improved ratios and also in men whose ED is due to biological factors

However, before you start taking the pill it is always better to ensure that you aren't allergic to any of the ingredients found in the pill Melanotan is said to be taman sivuston viagra vs cialis pfizer viagra the Barbie peptide which can make you tan, thin and horny

Eat whole grains in combination this site using cialis and viagra together with Phentermine diet pills, Whole grains generally, contains two types of fiber, namely insoluble and soluble Insoluble fiber helps in the movement of material through the digestive system and increases stool bulk

615true numbers bottomright 240true true 800http://www.sonalisells.com/wp-content/plugins/thethe-image-slider/style/skins/frame-black
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide67
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide64
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide65
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide68
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide6
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide7
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide8
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide67
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide9
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide12
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide10
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide11
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide13
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide14
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide15
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide16
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide17
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide19
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide25
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide20
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide20
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide21
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide22
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide24
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide25
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide26
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide27
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide28
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide29
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide31
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide32
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide33
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide34
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide35
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide38
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide39
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide40
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide48
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide49
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide39
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide40
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide41
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide42
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide43
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide44
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide45
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide46
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide47
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide48
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide49
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide50
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide51
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide52
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide53
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide54
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide55
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide56
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide57
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide58
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide59
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide60
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide61
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide62
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide63
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
?

Quick Contact

captcha

Posts Tagged ‘pleasanton realtor’

Investors – two sides of a story…

Monday, April 8th, 2013

Housing investors buy in bulk, aim to profit in hard-hit areas

Alejandro Lazo | Los Angeles Times | March 16, 2013 | link

Invitation Homes bought one of its first fixer-uppers in the San Fernando Valley just last May, a three-bedroom steps from a sought-after school in north Granada Hills.

More than 200 homes later, the company’s Dodger Blue “for rent” signs are a fixture in the Valley — markers for a massive Wall Street wager on the housing recovery.

Created last year by private equity titan Blackstone Group, Invitation Homes has spent about $3.5 billion buying 20,000 houses in nine U.S. markets, including Southern California. It’s a new business model emerging from the misery of the mortgage meltdown.

Blackstone and a handful of other firms believe prices fell too far in the hardest-hit markets. So they’re racing to buy up the bargains, rent them for short-term profit and hold them for long-term price appreciation. These firms say they’ve invented a new investment strategy that also serves the public good by fueling the housing recovery and sprucing up homes.

The company is creating jobs and providing quality homes for families, said Mark Beisswanger, Invitation Homes chief operating officer.

“We feel good about being able to fix up what is generally one of the worst houses on the street,” he said.

But some experts challenge the business model, and critics call it profiteering at the expense of neighborhoods and families who want to buy the same affordable homes. John Husing, an economist who studies the Inland Empire, notes the irony in Wall Street buying up Main Street.

“They create the problem — and now they are taking advantage of the problem,” Husing said.

In all, major investors have raised between $6 billion and $9 billion to buy single-family homes, according to a recent analysis by investment bank Keefe, Bruyette & Woods. The goal is to bring corporate scale and efficiency to what has historically been a mom-and-pop, single-family-home rental business.

These firms are also exploring ways of packaging rental income streams into securities, similar to the way mortgages were bundled during the boom years. Those mortgage bonds — often packed with risky home loans that produced mass defaults — turned into the toxic assets that helped bring down major banks during the financial crisis.

The Blackstone shopping spree has extended into several Southern California areas, including the city of Oxnard, South Los Angeles, the Antelope Valley and the Inland Empire, according to property records tracked by the real estate firm DataQuick. In some cases, the company has swarmed neighborhoods once ravaged by foreclosed homes. In a single ZIP Code in the Inland Empire, Fontana’s 92336, the firm has bought 74 homes in less than a year.

The firm has also invested in Northern California. Statewide, Blackstone has poured close to $740 million into California real estate through January, according to DataQuick figures. Nationally, the firm has invested in seven other regions: Atlanta, Phoenix, Charlotte, Seattle, Las Vegas, Chicago and multiple cities in Florida.

The investors have played a major role in recent home-price surges. Southern California’s median home price has jumped 21% over the last year, with more than a third of buyers last month paying cash. In the process, financial firms — including Oaktree Capital Management, Colony Capital and the Alaska Permanent Fund (which manages that state’s investments) — are rapidly staking claims as the new landlords of the suburbs.

On paper, the buy-and-hold calculus makes sense. The foreclosure crisis destroyed home values — but drove up rents, as repossessions created a new wave of rental demand from would-be owners with ruined credit. Fresh demand from young workers, a short supply of newly built rental units, and stricter mortgage requirements have also made the rental market competitive.

Last year, the Federal Reserve advocated renting out foreclosed homes as a strategy for banks to limit losses. Government-controlled mortgage giant Fannie Mae initiated a pilot program selling foreclosed homes in bulk, raising investors’ hopes of buying at discounts from big institutions.

But the jury is out as to whether the smartest guys in the room can create prominent national brands in a historically labor intensive, low-margin business. An acute inventory shortage — particularly in Western markets, where demand for cheap homes is so high — has made the acquisition of houses increasingly competitive.

“If the prices move ahead too fast — before you have a big enough portfolio — the opportunity could disappear,” said Jade J. Rahmani, the lead Keefe, Bruyette & Woods analyst on the industry report.

That sense of urgency has led some firms to begin buying regular homes alongside bank-owned properties, competing with everyday home buyers and small-time home flippers who renovate properties to sell.

The big investors are creating “auction fever” and driving up prices, said Nick Halaris, co-founder of AH Capital, a company that renovates and resells foreclosed homes in South Los Angeles. He remains skeptical that these firms will be able to manage these rentals effectively. Costs of regular maintenance and serving tenants add up.

“I think it’s crazy, their strategy, especially in L.A. or major markets, because we have managed portfolios of single-family rentals in different places,” Halaris said. “The expense ratios are out of control, so I am not sure these plans are going to pan out.”

Consumer and community advocates are also skeptical that big financial players will make the best neighborhood stewards. Invitation Homes has amassed 80 homes in just two ZIP Codes of South Los Angeles — 90047 and 90044 — buying in both middle-class and low-income areas.

An Invitation Homes for-rent sign recently popped up next to Albert Ramos’ West 69th Street duplex, where he lives with his wife and two children. Ramos has been a homeowner for three years. He would prefer to have another homeowner move into the orange stucco house next door.

“The people that rent it might be here for just a few months, then leave,” Ramos, 31, mused as he puffed on a cigarette on his front steps.

About a mile and a half away south on Normandie Avenue, prospective renter Brenda Browning, 59, stood in the yard of another Invitation Homes property for rent, peering through its windows.

“I love everything about it — the hardwood floors, the landscaping — it’s just beautiful,” Browning said. “And it’s in, what seems to be at least, a quiet neighborhood. I live on 105th and Figueroa right now, and I wouldn’t wish that on anybody. I hate it.”

Vulnerable South Los Angeles neighborhoods do not need more investors looking to buy low and sell high, said Earl Ofari Hutchinson, founder of the Urban Policy Roundtable.

“It’s easy pickings down there — you had a lot of foreclosures over the last years, people are economically challenged and have lost their homes, and you can get properties on the dime at fire-sale prices,” Hutchinson said. “Does that really benefit the area? Essentially, no.”

Executives at Invitation Homes counter that they can boost neighborhood fortunes and make a profit at the same time. Beisswanger, a former home builder, envisions hundreds of neighborhoods across the country dotted with his Dodger Blue signs.

On a recent tour of some of the company’s San Fernando Valley homes, Beisswanger strode through a single-story Canoga Park property, quickly assessing its bones and making note of what might have to go: the popcorn ceiling, dated walls, flooring, kitchen countertops, appliances, doors, light fixtures, bathroom vanities, maybe even the electrical system.

An illegal apartment built out of the home’s garage revealed kitchen walls smeared with grease, an undersized bathroom door and a moldy skylight.

“It is every code violation,” Beisswanger said with disdain. “We will provide a nice house for a family to rent; we are providing jobs; and we are potentially fixing dangerous situations.”

Whether these big investors will achieve the scale they need to make their businesses work remains an open question. Rick Sharga, executive vice president for Carrington Mortgage Holdings — which is partnering with private equity firm Oaktree to purchase homes for rent — said his company has taken a bit of a “breather” and is waiting for prices to “settle down a little bit.”

One of the biggest issues is that the government and big financial institutions have not sold off their foreclosed homes in large portfolios, as had been expected after Fannie Mae concluded its pilot sales. That has meant that investment firms have had to compete at local foreclosure auctions and on the open market — making those properties increasingly expensive.

At a recent rainy auction in front of the San Bernardino courthouse, Roger Zapata, an individual investor, said he had lost out to a bigger player.

“They are going really, really high.… The investors are getting pretty desperate,” he said. “I don’t know how long this is going to last. It’s a big question mark.”

Staying steady…

Wednesday, March 27th, 2013

Freddie Says: Mortgage Rates Steady

RISMedia | March 12, 2013 | link

mortgage_rates_object_blocks [1]Freddie Mac recently released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®), showing average fixed mortgage rates largely holding steady from the previous week, remaining near their 65-year record lows, and continuing to provide support for the housing recovery.

Results showed that the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) averaged 3.52 percent with an average 0.7 point for the week ending March 7, 2013, up from last week when it averaged 3.51 percent. Last year at this time, the 30-year FRM averaged 3.88 percent.

Additionally, the 15-year FRM this week averaged 2.76 percent with an average 0.7 point, the same as last week. A year ago at this time, the 15-year FRM averaged 3.13 percent.

The survey shows that the 5-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) averaged 2.63 percent this week with an average 0.5 point, up from last week when it averaged 2.61 percent. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 2.81 percent.

The 1-year Treasury-indexed ARM averaged 2.63 percent this week with an average 0.3 point, down from last week when it averaged 2.64 percent. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 2.73 percent.

Average commitment rates should be reported along with average fees and points to reflect the total upfront cost of obtaining the mortgage. Visit the following links for the Regional and National Mortgage Rate Details and Definitions. Borrowers may still pay closing costs which are not included in the survey.

“With gross domestic product growing only 0.1 percent in the fourth quarter of 2012, inflation remains at bay and consequently mortgage rates low,” says Frank Nothaft, vice president and chief economist, Freddie Mac. In fact, the price index of personal consumption expenditures rose only 0.1 percent in January which was below the market consensus forecast. Moreover, these low mortgage rates are helping to revive the housing market. For instance the CoreLogic® home price index rose 9.7 percent between January 2012 and 2013, marking the largest annual increase since April 2006.”

Keep an eye on your refi…

Friday, March 22nd, 2013

Avoid overcharges when refinancing

New tool aims to eliminate pricing gamesmanship when comparing loan options

Jack Guttentag | Inman News | Monday, March 4, 2013 | link

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=52945699" target="_blank">Percent symbol</a> image via Shutterstock.” width=”225″ /><a href=Percent symbol image via Shutterstock.

The process of deciding whether to refinance a mortgage in order to lower costs involves four steps:

  • Step one: Select the preferred type of new mortgage.
  • Step two: Find the best available price on that mortgage.
  • Step three: Determine whether the cost of the new mortgage will be lower than the cost of retaining the current mortgage.
  • Step four: Find a way to prevent being overcharged after committing to the transaction.

Because borrowers navigating these steps must access multiple sources of information, many of which are unreliable if not biased, it is hardly surprising that many bad decisions are made.

The most important of the bad decisions are those not to refinance by many who would profit from doing so. I have written about this several times, most recently in “4 refinance myths debunked.” Among those who do refinance, the most common mistakes are in selecting the wrong type of new mortgage and then overpaying for it.

Common approaches to step one: Borrowers usually select the type of new mortgage they prefer from among the multiple versions of fixed- and adjustable-rate products that are available, before the refinance process begins; for example, they decide they want to replace their current 30-year fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) with another 30-year FRM. This means that their selection ignores price relationships between the different mortgage types. Sometimes this approach makes sense, but all too often it doesn’t.

Common approaches to step two: Borrowers price the new mortgage in a variety of ways. Some use prices reported by the media, which are not adjusted for the specifics of individual transactions, and will therefore be correct only by accident. Others use quotes from loan officers or mortgage brokers, which may also be incomplete and in many cases have a downward bias designed to induce shoppers to become clients.

Borrowers who price their transaction online increase their chances of getting an accurate price, but not by much because few sites ask for the detailed information required to price accurately. (More shoppers complete short questionnaires than long ones.) The few sites that price accurately are multi-lender sites: See “How effectively can you shop at multi-lender websites?

Common approaches to step three: Comparing the cost of the current mortgage with that of the new mortgage is not difficult when the old mortgage rate is 6 percent and the new rate about 3 percent, but when the spread is much smaller, as it will be for those who have already refinanced at least once, the challenge is greater.

Some borrowers concoct their own schemes for answering this question, which (based on the ones I see) are almost certain to be wrong. Using an online calculator raises the probability of getting it right to roughly 50 percent. This is based on my recent investigation of the first 10 refinance calculators that came up on Google, five of which were seriously flawed. See “Best real estate refi calculators.”

Common approaches to step four: Few borrowers know how to protect themselves against overcharges after they have committed to the transaction. One common approach is to place oneself in the hands of a recommended loan officer or mortgage broker, in the hope of fair treatment. Sometimes this works, often it doesn’t.

Those more cynical try to protect themselves by price shopping among multiple loan providers. This works even less often, because no loan provider can be held to a price quote, and the one with the lowest quote is usually the biggest liar.

The borrowers who protect themselves the best shop the few multi-lender websites that post prices received directly from lenders, without intermediation by loan officers.

What has been conspicuously missing in the marketplace has been one reliable information source supporting all four steps in the refinance process, but that is no longer the case. Prospective refinance borrowers can now find this facility on my site. This is how it works:

Prospective borrowers input the information we need to calculate the costs of each type of new mortgage over the period they expect to have the mortgage. This allows them to select the type of new mortgage that will minimize their cost (step one).

The prices used in calculating the costs of each type of mortgage are the lowest of those we receive from the certified lenders who post their prices with us (step two).

Prospective borrowers also input the information we need to calculate the costs of retaining their existing mortgage. This allows borrowers to compare the costs of the different new mortgages with the cost of retaining the old one (step three).

Our lenders post their prices directly with us, without loan officer intermediation. This eliminates the potential for pricing gamesmanship by intermediaries after borrowers have committed themselves (step four).

In sum, borrowers effectively confront all four refinance steps at the same time and at the same place. To try it, go to Single Integrated Refinance Process

Mortgage Interest Deduction – An Interesting Perspective

Tuesday, March 19th, 2013
Is the Mortgage Interest Deduction Impeding Home Ownership?

Jann Swanson | Mortgage News Daily | Feb 27 2013 | link

The Hamilton Project, an economic policy initiative at the Brookings Institution, invited 15 economists of different philosophies to submit proposals for rethinking the Federal Budget.  In the eighth of the resulting papers Alan Viard, Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute, proposed to replace the mortgage interest deduction with a refundable credit to reduce the artificial incentive for the construction of high-end homes by better targeting the tax breaks for housing.

Viard says current tax policy offers unwarranted subsidies for the purchase of expensive homes by high-income taxpayers, but does little to promote homeownership by those of more modest means.  He contends that, in addition to the actual mortgage interest deduction, homeowners receive an additional benefit from the tax code in the form of an exemption from tax on imputed rent.

Imputed rent is value of housing services provided by an owner-occupied home as measured by the cost of obtaining the same services from a rental property.   Viard says to maintain neutrality with respect to the current taxation of business capital; the tax system would need to tax homeowners on this return while allowing a deduction for the associated costs, including mortgage interest payments.  Instead, under the current tax system the homeowner gets the best of both worlds, paying no taxes on imputed rent but yet still deducting mortgage interest payments.

Taxpayers who itemize deductions rather than taking the standard deduction may deduct the interest paid on up to $1 million of mortgage debt plus up to $100,000 of home equity loans. Mortgage interest on a second home may also be deducted as long as the total remains within the dollar limits. Essentially the same rules apply under the alternative minimum tax, except that home equity loan interest cannot be deducted.

Viard said the mortgage interest deduction would be allowed under a neutral tax system but not the tax exemption for imputed rent.  He provides the following example, breaking the tax advantage into two components, one of which is linked to mortgage interest.

“Suppose that a taxpayer who itemizes deductions and is in the top 39.6 percent bracket (rounded to 40 percent for simplicity) owns a home worth $1.5 million with a $1 million mortgage. If the home provides a 5 percent rate of return in terms of housing services and the mortgage rate is also 5 percent, then the taxpayer receives $75,000 of imputed rent and pays $50,000 of mortgage interest. Under a neutral tax system, the homeowner would pay $10,000 of tax on imputed rent minus mortgage interest; under the current tax system, the homeowner actually receives a $20,000 tax saving from deducting the mortgage interest. The $30,000 total tax advantage provided by the current tax system, which is equal to 40 percent of the imputed rent, can be broken down into a $20,000 benefit from the mortgage deduction and a $10,000 benefit from the failure to tax imputed rent minus mortgage interest.”

The Treasury Department classified the mortgage deduction as a $111 billion tax expenditure and the failure to tax imputed rent minus mortgage interest as a $59 billion tax expenditure for fiscal 2014.

Viard said there may be a good economic case for promoting home ownership but no case for subsidizing bigger or more-expensive homes. Yet the current tax treatment benefits most taxpayers in the highest brackets and provides more-generous treatment to taxpayers who itemize than to those who claim the standard deductions.  This tax structure may actually impede homeownership for lower income taxpayers he says by driving up the demand for homes and boosting home prices.

Viard proposes that starting in 2015, the mortgage interest deduction be converted to a 15 percent refundable tax credit available to all homeowners whether they itemize or not or have any income tax liability. The credit would be limited to interest on $300,000 of mortgage debt (in 2013 dollars), with no tax relief for mortgages on second homes or on home-equity loans. The dollar limit is indexed to the consumer price index (CPI).

Taxpayers with existing mortgage debt would be allowed to claim 90 percent of the current-law deduction in 2015 with the deduction declining by 10 percent in each subsequent year.  The homeowner could switch to the credit at any time.

Viard says his proposal could increase tax revenues by approximately $300 billion over ten years.

This plan does not end the tax preference for homeownership, but merely scales it back and retargets it toward less-expensive homes and taxpayers of more modest means.  While Viard thinks it would be preferable to directly eliminate the tax advantage for expensive homes by taxing imputed rent on such homes, this is politically impossible and administratively difficult so his proposal leaves the current tax advantage for the equity that homeowners have in their homes intact and limits the tax advantage only on the mortgaged portion of home value.

Viard acknowledges his plan has some weaknesses. First, taxpayers may neutralize the effects with changes in assets and debts.  For example, if a heavily mortgaged high income homeowner sells other assets to pay off the mortgage, then the proposal does not diminish the housing tax advantage and raises no revenue. The tax savings previously obtained from deducting interest on the mortgage are replaced by the tax savings from no longer paying tax on the income from other assets and the taxpayer continues to fully enjoy the benefits of tax-free imputed rent.   The taxpayer could achieve the same results by paying off the mortgage with money borrowed against other assets and deducting the interest on the new debt as investment interest.

Second, any reduction of the mortgage deduction is likely to reduce the value of existing homes but Viard says the transition period should cushion the blow to current homeowners and that the price impact is likely to be more modest than some observers have suggested.

The availability of the credit to all homeowners may reduce the number of taxpayers choosing to itemize, diminishing incentives to engage in other tax-deductible activity such as charitable giving.

Time to go to Tahoe?

Friday, March 15th, 2013

Mountain resort home sales rise from recession’s ashes

Some developments across West reporting nearly $100 million in transactions

Steve Bergsman | Inman News |  Friday, February 22, 2013 | link

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic.mhtml?id=93855577" target="_blank">Mountain home</a> image via Shutterstock.” width=”225″ /><a href=Mountain home image via Shutterstock.

There you are standing at the top of the ski hill with snow flurries softly whipping about your face. You peer through your ski goggles at the calm, translucent world and ponder, “Wouldn’t it be great if I owned a home out here and I could ski all winter?”

Apparently, the fellow with the snowboard next to you is already thinking the same thing, as is that woman who just came off the lift and earlier in the day raced you to the bottom of the mountain.

After the recession, when the sales climate for mountain resorts turned frosty, the market for second homes or retirement homes in resort-centric mountain developments has heated up like a fireplace stoked with extra pine logs.

I checked in with three Western resorts, all relatively new and each with a different backstory, to see what was going on. The common denominator for each has been a resurgent market for homes and lots.

My first stop on the tour was Martis Camp, a private, 2,177-acre luxury community located between Truckee, Calif., and North Lake Tahoe. The four-season community, which includes a central lodge, golf course, ski lift that goes directly to the Northstar ski mountain, and plenty of amenities and activities for families, started selling properties in 2006, just before real estate investments were crushed in the financial market avalanche.

In some regards, Martis Camp’s location — driving distance from Silicon Valley — kept it a bit insulated from the problems elsewhere in the country. Although the economy slipped into recession in 2008, the tech business continued to click along and create new wealth.

“During the recession, we defied gravity in some ways,” said Brian Hull, director of sales at Martis Camp. “We continued to sell at a good pace after the market crashed.”

Due to uncertain times, lots were discounted 10 percent in 2009, and that year there were 40 properties sold. In the equally economically dismal year of 2010, another 50 lots were sold. As the economy recovered, things got even better with $90 million worth of lots sold in 2011, and then in 2012, 110 lots and 10 custom homes were transacted for a record sales volume year of just under $100 million.

At Martis Camp, no one has to build once a lot is purchased. The lot could be left as native forest, but there were just shy of 200 homes under construction and 75 in the design phase, which, Hull said, “is way above our pro forma.”

The world is equally grand at the Montage Deer Valley in the Park City/Deer Valley, Utah, area.

The beautiful luxury hotel opened on Dec. 9, 2010, in the heart of the recession. What looked to be bad timing was just another snow day in one of the most well-known ski locations in the West.

Unlike Martis Camp, Montage Deer Valley is a resort hotel where the top floor units are for sale. The number of residences for the private market totals 81, with 32 marketed as unfurnished and the rest furnished.

Like most condo-hotels, owners can put their units into the rental pool of the hotel, but it’s not mandatory.

Obviously, skiing is a major attraction with three lifts to the nearest mountain, but Montage also boasts a 35,000-square-foot spa, four restaurants, a pool, and membership in a club for those who want to play golf in the warmer weather.

During the first year of operation, the resort sold 14 residences, said Ed Rehill, director of residential sales at Montage Deer Valley. Things have only gotten better, with the resort selling 10 more residences in the last 12 months for a sales volume of $90 million.

Who has been buying at Montage Deer Valley? The buy profile is fairly typical: couples in their 40s and 50s with children. They come mostly from California, the East Coast and a few from Mexico.

“We think mountain properties are looking at a comeback,” Rehill said. “This is reflected by our six sales during this past summer, which is uncommon for a ski-in/ski-out luxury resort such as ours. It was an indicator that people are starting to come out of the woodwork, tired of keeping their money on the sidelines.”

Pronghorn, an Auberge resort near Bend, Ore., is different from Montage Deer cialis online Valley and Martis Camp in that it is not located in the mountains, but in the high desert just as the land rises to become the Cascade Mountains. There’s no ski-in/ski-out, but homeowners do ski at Mount Bachelor, about 40 minutes away by car. With about 360 days of sunshine a year, golf is the major attraction at Pronghorn.

The major difference between Pronghorn and the other two resort programs mentioned in this column is that it was a development pierced by the recession. Originally, Pronghorn was intended to be a gated-residential community. The recession finished off those plans, and last year it was purchased by the Resort Group out of Hawaii, which recreated the property as a luxury Auberge resort.

“With new ownership, there are a lot of new plans in place,” said Ed Jackman, Pronghorn’s director of sales and marketing. “We are looking at substantial resort development and the relaunch of the real estate product.”

Despite the change in ownership and management, 2012 proved to be a turnaround year for the property, Jackman said. Last year, seven properties were sold, with two pending sales continuing into 2013. In addition, three parcels of land were sold.

People come to Pronghorn and Bend, as Jackman said, to “embrace the outdoor lifestyle, as access to outdoor activity is unmatched with rock climbing, hiking, skiing and biking. There are times here when you can golf, fly fish and ski all in one day.”

Asked if better sales were due to the reorganization and shift in focus at the property or the economy, Jackman said it was a little of both, adding, “With a better economy, there’s more of a positive outlook, and people are getting back out there, looking at these types of properties all over again.”

- See more at: http://www.inman.com/buyers-sellers/columnists/sbergsmancoxnet/mountain-resort-home-sales-rise-recessions-ashes?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+inmannews+%28Inman+News+-+Headlines%29#sthash.ccm3faLl.dpuf

Sonali’s Philosophy

I approach my real estate practice with a commitment to provide superior service. I have a passion for my chosen career and look forward to being your tenacious advocate for all your real estate needs.

Be assured that when you hire me, I will do an exceptional job for you. You can count on my honesty and trustworthiness, which for me is non-negotiable.

I look forward to working with you.

925-525-2569

sonali@sonalisells.com

Client Testimonials

"Sonali is a 1st class agent. My home sold the first day it went on the market. I was travelling out of town during this time and Sonali was exceptionally efficient in taking care of all the details regarding the sale of my house. She took care of all the details in a very professional and efficient manner. She was exceptionally thorough in her service."

- Barbara Usher

Click for more client testimonials

Mortgage Calculator

$
  %
  yrs
  %
$

Affordability Calculator

Monthly Gross Income $
Monthly Debt Expenses [?] $
Down Payment: $
Interest Rate: %

Closing Cost Estimator

Loan Information
Loan Amount $
View/Edit Closing Cost Details