615true numbers bottomright 240true true 800http://www.sonalisells.com/wp-content/plugins/thethe-image-slider/style/skins/frame-black
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide1
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide22
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide4
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide5
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide6
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide7
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide8
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide9
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide10
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide11
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide12
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide13
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide14
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide15
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide16
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide17
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide19
  • 5000 random true 60 bottom 30
    Slide20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
?

Quick Contact

captcha

Posts Tagged ‘pleasanton realtor’

In with the new?

Friday, April 13th, 2012

Buy New or Tear Down?

June Fletcher, Wall Street Journal, March 30, 2012, link

Q. My kids are grown and I’m looking to relocate closer to downtown D.C. I want to a new house with a first-floor master suite. I have visited every new-home development in the area I’m interested in, but few offer first-floor masters. Out of desperation, I am now thinking of buying an older house, tearing it down, and building what I want. Does this make sense? What’s involved?

–McLean, Va.

A. Before you give up on new-home developments, wait a while, since your choices are likely to improve soon. The Urban Land Institute recently released a forecast that projects a huge bump-up in national housing starts over the next two years. Meanwhile, the National Association of Home Builders expects single-family housing starts in the Washington D.C. metro area to jump 24.7% in 2012 and 37.3% in 2013.

In the meantime, weigh the pros and cons of a teardown.

On the plus side, you can choose the design and neighborhood you like; you’ll be in a place with mature landscaping and established amenities; and you won’t have to choke on dust and dodge concrete trucks while your neighbors’ homes are constructed, as you would in an all-new community.

On the other hand, unless other homes have been replaced, you may wind up with the most expensive house in the neighborhood, which will limit its appreciation potential. If you want to build a bigger house than what’s there now, you could face zoning hurdles. You could also attract anger and even legal challenges from neighbors who don’t want a new home nearby because it will make theirs look obsolete.

If this doesn’t daunt you, the process is straightforward, and similar to building on a vacant lot. However, you will need to have the old home inspected for hazardous materials like asbestos (and make arrangements to have it removed safely if it does); get a permit from the building department and permission from the lender to tear it down; and notify fire and utility companies so utilities can be disconnected properly.

Your builder will guide you through this process, so take care in picking one. Infill building used to be the province of small builders, but during the recession many larger ones got into the game, too. As you compare them, don’t just look at the bottom line. Check out the quality of their finishes, appliances, HVAC systems, windows and doors. Ask how often you’ll be allowed to visit the home during construction, and what you’ll be charged if you change your mind about anything during the building process. Compare their warranties.

Get a list of at least five customer references, and if possible, visit them. Ask private builders for bank references; read the annual reports of public ones. Check out every candidate you’re considering with the Better Business Bureau, and also do Internet searches of the businesses’ names, along with the word “complaints.”

Remember, once you sign a contract with a builder, you are locked in—so before you begin fantasizing about your dream home, do your homework.

In local news…recap of last week’s school board meeting.

Friday, March 23rd, 2012

Pleasanton school board to consider borrowing from technology fund to pay for facilities plan
Transitional kindergarten, homework policy also on tonight’s agenda for discussion

Glenn Wohltmann, Pleasanton Weekly, March 13, 2012, link

The Pleasanton school board tonight will look at the possibility of borrowing money from a fund set up with the sale of property — known as the Sycamore fund — to pay for a facilities master plan already approved by the district.

The district has been using the fund, which was set up for technology improvements in the district, as a sort of revolving loan to itself. In 2001, the Sycamore fund stood at more than $7.2 million. Now it’s down to a little over $4.9 million, with more than $2.4 million owed by the district.

The move is not up for a vote this evening; Board Member Valerie Arkin asked the district to consider other sources to pay for the facilities master plan, which will cost the district $263,910, along with another $28,550 for an updated demographer’s report.

The last demographer’s report came under fire at a special meeting to discuss the district’s debt; members of the audience who attended that meeting said some of the projects listed in that report would be in places where homes couldn’t be built and in other places were construction is unlikely at best.

Also on the agenda for the meeting tonight is transitional kindergarten. The state-mandated plan would change the entry date for kindergarten to 5 years old by Nov. 1, with younger children sent to transitional kindergarten instead.

The idea would send older, more mature children to regular kindergarten, and send younger ones to the transitional program, which would be taught by teachers and include structured play as well as elements from traditional kindergarten. The proposal discussed by the board at its last

The board will also hear a proposal to allow early retirement for some longtime employees. If 59 employees take an early retirement package, that would allow the district to avoid 59 anticipated layoffs.

Homework is also on the agenda for tonight. The board will hear a mid-year report on changes to homework policy that were implemented at the beginning of the school year.

The school board meets in the district’s headquarters at 4665 Bernal Ave.

Banks vs. Churches

Friday, March 16th, 2012

Banks foreclose on churches in record numbers

The Bible preaches forbearance, but Mammon turns a deaf ear

Below:

Reverend Gregory G. Groover sits for a portrait inside the Charles St. AME Church in the Roxbury neighborhood of Boston

Brian Snyder, Reuters, March 9, 2012, link

LOS ANGELES — Banks are foreclosing on America’s churches in record numbers as lenders increasingly lose patience with religious facilities that have defaulted on their mortgages, according to new data.

The surge in church foreclosures represents a new wave of distressed property seizures triggered by the 2008 financial crash, analysts say, with many banks no longer willing to grant struggling religious organizations forbearance.

Since 2010, 270 churches have been sold after defaulting on their loans, with 90 percent of those sales coming after a lender-triggered foreclosure, according to the real estate information company CoStar Group.

In 2011, 138 churches were sold by banks, an annual record, with no sign that these religious foreclosures are abating, according to CoStar. That compares to just 24 sales in 2008 and only a handful in the decade before.

The church foreclosures have hit all denominations across America, black and white, but with small to medium size houses of worship the worst. Most of these institutions have ended up being purchased by other churches.

The highest percentage have occurred in some of the states hardest hit by the home foreclosure crisis: California, Georgia, Florida and Michigan.

“Churches are among the final institutions to get foreclosed upon because banks have not wanted to look like they are being heavy handed with the churches,” said Scott Rolfs, managing director of Religious and Education finance at the investment bank Ziegler.

Church defaults differ from residential foreclosures. Most of the loans in question are not 30-year mortgages but rather commercial loans that typically mature after just five years when the full balance becomes due immediately.

Its common practice for banks to refinance such loans when they come due. But banks have become increasingly reluctant to do that because of pressure from regulators to clean up their balance sheets, said Rolfs.

“A lot of these loans were given when the properties were evaluated at a certain level in 2005 or 2006,” Rolfs said. “Banks have had to reappraise the value of these properties, whether it’s a church or a commercial office building. Values have gone down, so the loans cannot continue in the same form.”

The factors leading to the boom in church foreclosures will sound familiar to many private homeowners evicted from their properties in recent years.

During the property boom, many churches took out additional loans to refurbish or enlarge, often with major lenders or with the Evangelical Christian Credit Union, which was particularly aggressive in lending to religious institutions.

Then after the financial crash, many churchgoers lost their jobs, donations plunged, and often, so did the value of the church building.

Congregations in trouble
Solid Rock Christian Church near Memphis, Tennessee, took out a $2.9 million loan with the Evangelical Christian Credit Union at the beginning of 2008, to construct a new, 2,000 seat, 34,000 square-foot building to house its growing congregation.

In the middle of construction, the economy crashed. The church raided its savings to finish the project, but ended up defaulting on the loan.

The ECCU foreclosed and put the church up for auction.

“We are still fighting this,” a church spokesman told Reuters. “We have filed for bankruptcy to stop this foreclosure and to restructure our debt.”

At the iconic Charles Street African American Episcopal Church in Boston, Massachusetts, churchgoers and clergy accuse the bank of being unwilling to negotiate.

The church is being threatened with foreclosure and a March 22 auction by its lender OneUnited bank, America’s largest black-owned bank.

The bank says the church, which was founded in 1818 and played a major role in the anti-slavery movement, has defaulted on a $1.1 million balloon loan that came due in December 2011.

A balloon loan is a long-term loan, often a mortgage, that has a large, or balloon, payment due upon maturity. They often have very low interest payments and require little capital outlay during the life of the loan due to the large end payment.

The church is also involved in separate litigation with OneUnited involving a 2006 loan of $3.6 million that financed the refurbishment of two buildings into a community center.

“We want to refinance and we want to pay. It’s doable, we have the means to do it but we can only do it if they actually sit down and talk to us,” said the Rev. Gregory G. Groover Snr, the church’s pastor.

Ballooning loan
Groover said the church did not default by missing monthly payments, but is in trouble because the loan ballooned.

“We don’t have a million dollars to pay off the loan. I don’t know what church does. The idea of auctioning off a church is senseless,” he said.

In a statement provided to Reuters, OneUntied said it was not its practice to discuss the details of “any discreet customer relationship”.

“It is not the practice of the Bank to exercise collection remedies including foreclosure in the absence of good cause. We trust the community will not rush to judgment without full knowledge of all the facts,” it said.

Axel Adams, an Atlanta, Georgia official with the Rainbow PUSH coalition, the civil rights and economic justice organization led by the Rev. Jesse Jackson, said he had seen a “tremendous increase” in churches facing foreclosure.

“And some pastors have not notified their congregants,” Adams said. “They are fearful that if they do, they will lose congregants prematurely.”

Flat Rock Church in Lithonia, Georgia, which dates back to 1860, took out an $850,000 balloon loan with Sun Trust Bank in 2005 to fund a new 300-seat church.

In May 2010 the loan became due. The bank foreclosed and the church is due to be auctioned off next month.

“The bank has refused to negotiate and to this day I just don’t know why,” said Binita Miles, the church pastor.

A spokesman for Sun Trust said: “We view foreclosure as an action of last resort. We have been working for several years to address the issue with the client in hopes of avoiding foreclosure.”

There are more than 300,000 churches in the United States.

“The church foreclosure market isn’t anything extraordinary,” said Rolfs. “It’s simply another byproduct of the credit bubble.”

Two homes = twice the mortgage. Here’s how to deal…

Friday, February 3rd, 2012

Second-home debt weighs on owners

Benny Kass Housing Counsel, New York Times, January 13, 2012, link

Q: We own a second home within five miles of our primary residence. This second home has been used as a rental, initially to persons we were not connected with in any way. For the past 10 years, two sets of relatives who were in need of a new start in life lived in the home. Each set of relatives lived there at different times. The current set has been there five years. The rental contract is for fair market value, though much less than the mortgage. Obviously, we have been paying the difference at a loss.

A few years back we obtained an interest-only loan on the home (prior to the current relatives moving in). We had the intent of selling the home within a couple of years. Now, the market is where it is. We are extremely upside down in the value of the home with no equity whatsoever. Financially, we are able to make the payment, but both my husband and I feel that we are just throwing money away each month. We would like to know what our options could be regarding this home.

We have heard from our tax person that if a short sale is done we could have a huge tax burden, which we cannot afford at this point in our lives (my husband is retired). We have excellent credit but feel that it would be extremely difficult to get a new loan because of the value and the fact that I am not working at this time. We have actually considered moving into the home ourselves and living in it for the required number of years and then selling it, but we are unsure how this would be beneficial.

A: There are several options available. But under no circumstances should you decide to walk away from the house; that’s merely burying your head in the sand and will have serious financial consequences for you.

Deed in lieu: Some lenders will allow you to give them the deed. This is “in lieu” of foreclosure. It will impact on your credit, but not as much as some of the other options below.

Short sale: This is an option whereby the house will be sold for less than the outstanding mortgage. Discuss this with your lender; sometimes you may not have to pay the entire difference between the sale price and the mortgage balance. However, this will impact your credit rating. Your tax adviser is correct. Because this is not your principal residence, you will have to pay income tax on the canceled debt. I call it “phantom income.”

Bankruptcy: You must discuss the pros and cons with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. However, filing for bankruptcy relief will not impact your credit as much as allowing the property to be foreclosed on.

Foreclosure: This is the absolute last resort.

Before you proceed along any of these paths, contact your lender and discuss your situation. It is often difficult to find a person with authority, but you should try as best you can. You may be able to work out some arrangement with the lender such as a lower interest rate, a loan modification, or a moratorium on making payments for several months.

Borrowers pay more for Fannie & Freddie changes…

Wednesday, February 1st, 2012

Sonali’s Philosophy

I approach my real estate practice with a commitment to provide superior service. I have a passion for my chosen career and look forward to being your tenacious advocate for all your real estate needs.

Be assured that when you hire me, I will do an exceptional job for you. You can count on my honesty and trustworthiness, which for me is non-negotiable.

I look forward to working with you.

925-525-2569

sonali@sonalisells.com

Client Testimonials

"Sonali is a 1st class agent. My home sold the first day it went on the market. I was travelling out of town during this time and Sonali was exceptionally efficient in taking care of all the details regarding the sale of my house. She took care of all the details in a very professional and efficient manner. She was exceptionally thorough in her service."

- Barbara Usher

Click for more client testimonials

Mortgage Calculator

$
  %
  yrs
  %
$

Affordability Calculator

Monthly Gross Income $
Monthly Debt Expenses [?] $
Down Payment: $
Interest Rate: %

Closing Cost Estimator

Loan Information
Loan Amount $
View/Edit Closing Cost Details